Apply to trial NCT07427108

A few quick questions so the study team can decide if you might be a fit.

RecruitingProcedure

Road Mapping Guided Puncture Versus Ultrasound Guided Puncture During Retrograde Angioplasty Feasibility and Safety

The study aims to compare the technical feasibility and safety of road mapping-guided versus ultrasound-guided retrograde arterial puncture in patients with (CLTI) as measured by: * Puncture success rate * Access-related complication rate (e.g., hematoma, vessel dissection, perforation)

How this works

Answer a few questions
About 5 to 10 minutes. Skip-friendly where possible.
We connect you with the study team
When a site picks up your application, we introduce you to their team directly — with you on the thread.
The team reaches out to schedule screening
Usually within a few business days, via the contact you give.

EmailWe save your progress under this email and copy you when we connect you with the study team.

I agree that Hipa.ai may share my application — my name, contact details, and my answers, including health information — with the official study team for this trial so they can review my responses and contact me.

By continuing, you agree to our terms of service.

Road Mapping Guided Puncture Versus Ultrasound Guided Puncture During Retrograde Angioplasty Feasibility and Safety

How this works

Answer a few questions

We connect you with the study team

The team reaches out to schedule screening