Laser-Ranibizumab-Triamcinolone for Diabetic Macular Edema
Part of paid clinical trials in Artesia, California.
- Sponsor
- Jaeb Center for Health Research
- Study ID
- NCT00444600
- Phase
- PHASE3
- Status
- Completed
Conditions
Eligibility Criteria
- Sex
- ALL
- Age
- 18 Years - N/A
- Healthy Volunteers
- Not accepted
Interventions
- Triamcinolone Acetonide + laser — DRUG4 mg intravitreal triamcinolone at randomization plus focal photocoagulation 1 week post-injection, repeated every 16 weeks with sham injections at 4-week intervals in-between. Retreatment starting at 16 weeks depends on visual acuity and OCT.
- Ranibizumab + laser — DRUG0.5 mg intravitreal ranibizumab at randomization plus focal photocoagulation 1 week post-injection. Injections are repeated every 4 weeks with focal photocoagulation given post-injection every 16 weeks. Retreatment starting at 16 weeks depends on visual acuity and OCT.
- Sham injection + laser — DRUGSham injection at randomization plus focal photocoagulation 1 week post-injection. Injections are repeated every 4 weeks with focal photocoagulation given post-injection every 16 weeks. Retreatment starting at 16 weeks depends on visual acuity and OCT.
- Ranibizumab + deferred laser — DRUG0.5 mg intravitreal ranibizumab at randomization, repeated every 4 weeks. Retreatment starting at 16 weeks depends on visual acuity and OCT. If improvement has not occured from injections alone, laser can be given starting at the 24 week visit.
Study Details
The purpose of the study is to find out which is a better treatment for diabetic macular edema (DME): laser alone, laser combined with an intravitreal injection of triamcinolone, laser combined with an intravitreal injection of ranibizumab, or intravitreal injection of ranibizumab alone. At the present time, it is not known whether intravitreal steroid or anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injections, with or without laser treatment, are better than just laser by itself. It is possible that one or both of the types of injections, with or without laser treatment, will improve vision more often than will laser without injections. However, even if better vision outcomes are seen with injections, side effects may be more of a problem with the injections than with laser. Therefore, this study is conducted to find out whether the benefits of the injections will outweigh the risks.
Key Dates
- First listed
- Mar 8, 2007
- Start date
- Mar 31, 2007
- Status verified
- Sep 2019
- Primary completion
- Dec 31, 2009
- Completion
- Feb 28, 2014
Study Design
- Enrollment
- 691 participants (actual)
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Intervention model
- PARALLEL
- Primary purpose
- TREATMENT
Arms
- Experimental: 0.5mg Ranibizumab plus laser
- Experimental: 0.5 mg Ranibizumab plus deferred laser
- Experimental: 4 mg Triamcinolone plus laser
- Active Comparator: Sham plus laser
Primary Outcome Measure
Mean Change in Visual Acuity (Letters) From Baseline to 1 Year Adjusted for Baseline Visual Acuity [ Time Frame: from baseline to 1 Year ]
Locations (50)
Find similar trials in Artesia, CA
Related Studies
- National Eye Institute Biorepository for Retinal DiseasesRecruiting · National Eye Institute (NEI) · Bethesda, Maryland
- Clinical Applications of Advanced Ophthalmic ImagingRecruiting · University of Miami · Miami, Florida
- Intraoperative OCT Guidance of Intraocular Surgery IIRecruiting · Duke University · Durham, North Carolina
- Village-Integrated Eye Worker Trial IIRecruiting · University of California, San Francisco · San Francisco, California