Bevacizumab vs Dacarbazine in Metastatic Melanoma

Sponsor
Haukeland University Hospital
Study ID
NCT01705392
Phase
PHASE2
Status
Terminated

Conditions

  • Metastatic Malignant Melanoma
  • Unresectable Malignant Melanoma

Eligibility Criteria

Sex
ALL
Age
18 Years - N/A
Healthy Volunteers
Not accepted

Interventions

  • Bevacizumab — DRUG
    Bevacizumab 10 mg/kg q3w
  • Propranolol — DRUG
    Propranolol 80 mg x 1
  • Enalapril — DRUG
    Enalapril 5 mg x 1
  • Dacarbazine — DRUG
    dacarbazine 1000 mg/m2 q3w

Study Details

The purpose of this study is to compare efficacy of bevacizumab monotherapy with standard chemotherapy (DTIC) in patients with metastatic malignant melanoma. In addition, we want to evaluate the predictive value of a set biomarkers associated with vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) dependent angiogenesis. Also, we aim to identify mechanisms causing acquired resistance to treatment with bevacizumab and escape mechanisms caused by other angiogenic growth factors than VEGF. Finally, we want to analyze safety and influence on outcome variables by primary prevention of bevacizumab induced hypertension by low dose beta blockers in comparison with an ACE inhibitor.

Key Dates

First listed
Oct 12, 2012
Start date
Jan 31, 2013
Status verified
Feb 2017
Primary completion
Feb 20, 2017
Completion
Feb 20, 2017

Study Design

Enrollment
2 participants (actual)
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT

Arms

  • Experimental: Bevacizumab plus propranolol
    Bevacizumab 10mg/kg q2w plus propranolol 80 mg x 1
  • Experimental: Bevacizumab plus enalapril
    Bevacizumab 10mg/kg q2w plus enalapril 5 mg x 1
  • Active Comparator: Dacarbazine
    Dacarbazine 1000mg/m2 q3w

Primary Outcome Measure

Progression free survival [ Time Frame: Average of 6 months ]