Bevacizumab vs Dacarbazine in Metastatic Melanoma
- Sponsor
- Haukeland University Hospital
- Study ID
- NCT01705392
- Phase
- PHASE2
- Status
- Terminated
Conditions
- Metastatic Malignant Melanoma
- Unresectable Malignant Melanoma
Eligibility Criteria
- Sex
- ALL
- Age
- 18 Years - N/A
- Healthy Volunteers
- Not accepted
Interventions
- Bevacizumab — DRUGBevacizumab 10 mg/kg q3w
- Propranolol — DRUGPropranolol 80 mg x 1
- Enalapril — DRUGEnalapril 5 mg x 1
- Dacarbazine — DRUGdacarbazine 1000 mg/m2 q3w
Study Details
The purpose of this study is to compare efficacy of bevacizumab monotherapy with standard chemotherapy (DTIC) in patients with metastatic malignant melanoma. In addition, we want to evaluate the predictive value of a set biomarkers associated with vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) dependent angiogenesis. Also, we aim to identify mechanisms causing acquired resistance to treatment with bevacizumab and escape mechanisms caused by other angiogenic growth factors than VEGF. Finally, we want to analyze safety and influence on outcome variables by primary prevention of bevacizumab induced hypertension by low dose beta blockers in comparison with an ACE inhibitor.
Key Dates
- First listed
- Oct 12, 2012
- Start date
- Jan 31, 2013
- Status verified
- Feb 2017
- Primary completion
- Feb 20, 2017
- Completion
- Feb 20, 2017
Study Design
- Enrollment
- 2 participants (actual)
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Intervention model
- PARALLEL
- Primary purpose
- TREATMENT
Arms
- Experimental: Bevacizumab plus propranololBevacizumab 10mg/kg q2w plus propranolol 80 mg x 1
- Experimental: Bevacizumab plus enalaprilBevacizumab 10mg/kg q2w plus enalapril 5 mg x 1
- Active Comparator: DacarbazineDacarbazine 1000mg/m2 q3w
Primary Outcome Measure
Progression free survival [ Time Frame: Average of 6 months ]