Circuitry Assessment and Reinforcement Training Effects on Recovery

Part of paid clinical trials in Baltimore, Maryland.

Sponsor
Johns Hopkins University
Study ID
NCT04290988
Status
Terminated

Conditions

  • Aphasia
  • Primary Progressive Aphasia
  • Stroke

Eligibility Criteria

Sex
ALL
Age
18 Years - N/A
Healthy Volunteers
Not accepted

Interventions

  • EEG Neurofeedback — DEVICE
    Active EEG neurofeedback
  • Sham Feedback — DEVICE
    Sham EEG feedback sessions identical to active sessions except that the feedback given to the participant will not be based on the individual's live EEG activity.

Study Details

This study investigates if electroencephalography (EEG) neurofeedback training is more beneficial than sham feedback training for the improvement of communication, anxiety, and sleep quality in individuals with aphasia. Half of the participants will receive active EEG neurofeedback sessions first, followed by sham feedback sessions in a crossover design. The other half of participants will undergo sham feedback sessions first, followed by active neurofeedback.

Key Dates

Start date
Sep 23, 2020
Status verified
Jan 2026
Primary completion
Sep 1, 2025
Completion
Sep 1, 2025

Study Design

Enrollment
7 participants (actual)
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT

Arms

  • Experimental: Active EEG Neurofeedback
    15 sessions of active EEG neurofeedback at a frequency of 3-5 sessions per week for a duration of 3-5 weeks.
  • Sham Comparator: Sham Feedback
    15 sessions of sham neurofeedback at a frequency of 3-5 sessions per week for a duration of 3-5 weeks.

Primary Outcome Measure

Change in Number of Items Correctly Named on the Philadelphia Naming Test [ Time Frame: Baseline, 1 week following each intervention period ]

Locations (1)

FacilityCityStateZIPSite coordinators
Johns Hopkins School of MedicineBaltimoreMaryland21287-

Find similar trials in Baltimore, MD

By condition

Related Studies