The Robot-LVA Study: Robot-assisted Microsurgical Lymphaticovenous Anastomosis in Breast Cancer-related Lymphedema

Sponsor
Maastricht University Medical Center
Study ID
NCT06532955
Status
Recruiting

Conditions

  • Lymphedema
  • Lymphedema Arm
  • Lymphedema of Limb
  • Lymphedema of Upper Arm
  • Lymphedema of Upper Limb
  • Lymphedema, Breast Cancer
  • Lymphedema, Non-Filarial
  • Lymphedema, Secondary
  • Lymphedema; Surgical

Eligibility Criteria

Sex
FEMALE
Age
18 Years - N/A
Healthy Volunteers
Not accepted

Interventions

  • Lymphaticovenous anastomosis using Microsure Motion Stabilizer — DEVICE
    The robot-assisted LVA is performed using the Microsure Motion Stabilizer, a telemanipulation tool that stabilizes a surgeon's movement during open microsurgical operations on extremities, specifically on veins and nerves that are close to the skin. The surgeon controls a joystick, which directly copies the surgeon's movements in real-time to an instrument held by the device. The device's software scales down the motions and filters out tremor. Surgical technique and method of treatment are identical to conventional microsurgery. The device is equipped with genuine microsurgical instruments and is compatible with existing surgical microscopes. Instead of holding the instrument directly in hand, which is limited in precision and dexterity, the surgeon operates while the instrument's movements are stabilized. The modular design allows the surgeon to decide what level of manipulation assistance is required during a certain procedure.
  • Lymphaticovenous anastomosis (manual) — PROCEDURE
    Lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA) involves connecting a lymphatic vessel to an adjacent vein of similar size, thereby facilitating the outflow of lymphatic fluid in patients suffering from secondary lymphedema

Study Details

This study assesses the performance of robot-assisted microsurgery. Lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA) is the most difficult procedure in microsurgery at this moment. The LVA technique is applied to treat for example breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL). Therefore, this LVA procedure is compared using a manual expert and the same expert applying robot-assisted LVA.

Key Dates

First listed
Aug 1, 2024
Start date
Jun 1, 2017
Status verified
Jul 2024
Primary completion
Jan 1, 2026
Completion
Jan 1, 2026

Study Design

Enrollment
60 participants (estimated)
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT

Arms

  • Experimental: Lymphaticovenous anastomosis using Microsure Motion Stabilizer
    Patients in this group undergo robot-assisted lymphaticovenous anastomosis at one or more locations on the affected arm. The procedure is performed under local anesthesia. Incisions are made at the sites where lymphatic vessels are obstructed, ensuring no harm to the viable part of the lymphatic system. The location(s) are determined prior to surgery using ICG lymphography. LVA(s) are made in the subdermal plane with the aid of a surgical microscope. Generally, 1 to 4 LVAs are made. The LVAs are madeusing a surgical microscope and the operation takes approximately 240 minutes.
  • Active Comparator: Lymphaticovenous anastomosis
    Patients in this group undergo lymphaticovenous anastomosis at one or more locations on the affected arm. The procedure is performed under local anesthesia. Incisions are made at the sites where lymphatic vessels are obstructed, ensuring no harm to the viable part of the lymphatic system. The location(s) are determined prior to surgery using ICG lymphography. LVA(s) are made in the subdermal plane with the aid of a surgical microscope. Generally, 1 to 4 LVAs are made. The LVAs are madeusing a surgical microscope and the operation takes approximately 90 minutes.

Primary Outcome Measure

Efficiency of lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA) [ Time Frame: Assessed at one moment during, maximally up to 1 year postoperatively ]

Central Contacts

Related Studies