Postoperative Analgesic Efficacy of ACB+iPACK vs FTB+Selective Tibial+Obturator Blocks in ACL Reconstruction
- Sponsor
- Da Nang Hospital
- Study ID
- NCT07702552
- Status
- Not Yet Recruiting
Notify me when recruiting opens
Save your spot on the interest list for this study. We'll keep your details with this study so our team can follow up when recruiting opens.
Add your contact details and location so we can keep your interest tied to this study.
Conditions
- Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries
- Postoperative Pain
Eligibility Criteria
- Sex
- ALL
- Age
- 16 Years - N/A
- Healthy Volunteers
- Not accepted
Interventions
- Ultrasound-guided Adductor Canal Block (ACB) — PROCEDUREUltrasound-guided administration of 10 mL levobupivacaine 0.2% into the adductor canal space to provide postoperative analgesia
- Ultrasound-guided iPACK block — PROCEDUREUltrasound-guided administration of 15 mL levobupivacaine 0.2% into the space between the popliteal artery and the posterior capsule of the knee to provide posterior knee analgesia.
- Ultrasound-guided Femoral Triangle Block (FTB) — PROCEDUREUltrasound-guided administration of 10 mL levobupivacaine 0.2% at the distal apex of the femoral triangle to provide anterior and medial knee analgesia
- Ultrasound-guided Selective Tibial Nerve Block — PROCEDUREUltrasound-guided administration of 5 mL levobupivacaine 0.2% around the tibial nerve in the popliteal fossa
- Ultrasound-guided Obturator Nerve Block — PROCEDUREUltrasound-guided administration of 10 mL levobupivacaine 0.2% targeting the anterior and posterior branches of the obturator nerve within the fascial planes between the adductor muscles.
Study Details
This prospective, comparative study aims to evaluate the postoperative analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided Adductor Canal Block (ACB) combined with iPACK block versus Femoral Triangle Block (FTB) combined with selective tibial nerve block and obturator nerve block in patients undergoing arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. The primary objective is to determine which regional anesthesia regimen provides superior pain relief at rest and during movement. The secondary objectives include assessing morphine consumption, motor blockade using the Bromage score, patient satisfaction, and potential adverse effects of these anesthesia techniques.
Key Dates
- First listed
- Jul 14, 2026
- Start date
- Jul 31, 2026
- Status verified
- Jul 2026
- Primary completion
- Mar 31, 2027
- Completion
- Mar 31, 2027
Study Design
- Enrollment
- 100 participants (estimated)
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Intervention model
- PARALLEL
- Primary purpose
- TREATMENT
Arms
- Experimental: ACB and iPACK Block GroupUltrasound-guided Adductor Canal Block (10ml levobupivacaine 0.2%) and iPACK block (15ml levobupivacaine 0.2%) combined with standard multimodal analgesia (Paracetamol + Diclofenac).
- Active Comparator: FTB, Tibial and Obturator Blocks GroupUltrasound-guided Femoral Triangle Block (10ml levobupivacaine 0.2%), selective Tibial Nerve Block (5ml levobupivacaine 0.2%), and Obturator Nerve Block (10ml levobupivacaine 0.2%) combined with standard multimodal analgesia
Primary Outcome Measure
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pain at Rest and Movement [ Time Frame: Within the first 24 hours postoperatively ]
Central Contacts
- Nhan Trong Phan, MD. MSc+84856271294
- Trong Nhan Phan
Related Studies
- Biologic Therapy to Prevent Osteoarthritis After ACL InjuryEARLY_PHASE1 · Recruiting · University of California, Los Angeles · Los Angeles, California
- Ketamine in Patients Undergoing TEVAR Procedures Receiving NCIPHASE2 · Recruiting · Sam Tyagi · Lexington, Kentucky
- Vibration and Post-traumatic Osteoarthritis Risk Following ACL InjuryRecruiting · University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill · Chapel Hill, North Carolina
- Virtual Reality and Olfactory Stimuli Multimodal Intervention to Reduce Post-Operative Pain and Anxiety in Patients Undergoing Cardiothoracic SurgeryRecruiting · Massachusetts General Hospital · Boston, Massachusetts