For research sites
Your studies are listed. Are they findable?
Everything you have registered on ClinicalTrials.gov already has a page here, and so does your site. Start by looking at what it currently says about you.
Type your site, clinic or hospital name.
One to five studies, and no marketing team.
You are competing for the same patients as networks with a recruitment department. What you have that they mostly don’t is a real relationship with the people in your city — and a website that cannot express it, because it was built once and the study list went stale.
Three things are free and take no build effort on your side: the site page that ranks for your name and your city, the applicants who arrive through it already screened against your protocol, and a full website that re-syncs itself from the registry so it can never go out of date.
Get your free site →Independent sites that received applicants through Hipa.ai in the last 45 days include Pinnacle Research Group, Saint Luke's Cancer Institute, San Francisco Research Institute, Cahaba Research, Central Care Cancer Center, Henry Ford Health System.
Every location indexed, under one brand.
We already map 550 networks across 43,535 sites, grouped the way patients search: by the location nearest them, under the brand they recognise.
Most network websites present twenty locations as a list of addresses on one contact page. That gives you one page competing in twenty local search markets, which is one page too few. Here, each location has its own profile with its own studies and its own local footprint, and every one of them links back to a hub page for the parent brand.
Your recruitment lead gets one login that switches between the sites they cover, so the pipeline for eight locations is one screen rather than eight mailboxes.
Talk to us about your network →Brand hubs live at hipa.ai/network and link every location we can resolve.
Built so your IRB does not have to rewrite it.
The reason academic recruitment pages are usually thin is not indifference — it is that every persuasive sentence needs review. So the default here is descriptive: study copy is drawn from the registry record rather than written as marketing, which is generally what a protocol already covers.
Where persuasive copy is wanted, it lives in versioned blocks your team approves before anything goes live, rather than a free-text field somebody can edit on a Friday afternoon. Compensation display is off by default.
Talk to us about an institutional setup →Three steps, no sales call required.
The recruitment part is free.
Your studies are public registry data; we index them either way. Charging you to be findable in a directory built from your own filings would be a strange business.
What we sell is placement and enrollment campaigns for specific studies, usually bought by the sponsor or CRO rather than the site. If a study you are running needs that, we can talk about it — but nothing above depends on it.
Start with your own page.
Find your site, see what it currently says, and tell us what is wrong with it.
Type your site, clinic or hospital name.