Ruxolitinib Phosphate or Dasatinib With Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Philadelphia Chromosome-Like Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
Part of paid clinical trials in Houston, Texas.
- Sponsor
- M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
- Study ID
- NCT02420717
- Phase
- PHASE2
- Status
- Terminated
Conditions
- Recurrent B Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
- Recurrent Ph-Like Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
- Refractory B Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
- Refractory Ph-Like Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
Eligibility Criteria
- Sex
- ALL
- Age
- 10 Years - N/A
- Healthy Volunteers
- Not accepted
Interventions
- Cyclophosphamide — DRUGGiven IV
- Cytarabine — DRUGGiven IV
- Dasatinib — DRUGGiven PO
- Dexamethasone — DRUGGiven PO or IV
- Doxorubicin — DRUGGiven IV
- Laboratory Biomarker Analysis — OTHERCorrelative studies
- Leucovorin — DRUGGiven IV or PO
- Mercaptopurine — DRUGGiven PO
- Methotrexate — DRUGGiven IV and PO
- Prednisone — DRUGGiven PO
- Rituximab — BIOLOGICALGiven IV
- Ruxolitinib Phosphate — DRUGGiven PO
- Vincristine — DRUGGiven IV
Study Details
This phase II trial studies the side effects and best dose of ruxolitinib phosphate and how well it works compared to dasatinib when given with chemotherapy in treating patients with Philadelphia chromosome-like acute lymphoblastic leukemia that has come back (relapsed) or has not responded to treatment (refractory). Ruxolitinib phosphate and dasatinib may stop the growth of cancer cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth. Drugs used in chemotherapy work in different ways to stop the growth of cancer cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. It is not yet known whether giving ruxolitinib phosphate or dasatinib with chemotherapy works better in treating patients with previously treated acute lymphoblastic leukemia.
Key Dates
- Start date
- Jul 15, 2015
- Status verified
- May 2025
- Primary completion
- Jan 20, 2021
- Completion
- Jan 20, 2021
Study Design
- Enrollment
- 11 participants (actual)
- Allocation
- NON_RANDOMIZED
- Intervention model
- SEQUENTIAL
- Primary purpose
- TREATMENT
Arms
- Experimental: Cohort A (ruxolitinib phosphate)Patients receive ruxolitinib phosphate PO BID. Cycles repeat every 21 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
- Experimental: Cohort B (dasatinib)Patients receive dasatinib PO QD. Cycles repeat every 21 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
- Experimental: Phase 1Patients Receive ruxolitinib Phosphate PO BID. Cycles repeat every 21 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Primary Outcome Measure
Maximal Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Ruxolitinib in Combination With Chemotherapy Defined as the Highest Dose Level at Which no More Than 1 Out of 6 Patients Experience a Dose Limiting Toxicity (Phase I) [ Time Frame: 42 days ]
Locations (1)
| Facility | City | State | ZIP | Site coordinators |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| M D Anderson Cancer Center | Houston | Texas | 77030 | - |
Find similar trials in Houston, TX
Related Studies
- Inotuzumab Ozogamicin and Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With Acute Lymphoblastic LeukemiaPHASE1/PHASE2 · Recruiting · M.D. Anderson Cancer Center · Houston, Texas
- Inotuzumab Ozogamicin in Treating Younger Patients With B-Lymphoblastic Lymphoma or Relapsed or Refractory CD22 Positive B Acute Lymphoblastic LeukemiaPHASE2 · Recruiting · Children's Oncology Group · Birmingham, Alabama
- A Study to Compare Blinatumomab Alone to Blinatumomab With Nivolumab in Patients Diagnosed With First Relapse B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (B-ALL)PHASE2 · Recruiting · National Cancer Institute (NCI) · Birmingham, Alabama
- Inotuzumab Ozogamicin and Blinatumomab With or Without Ponatinib in Treating Patients With Newly Diagnosed, Recurrent, or Refractory CD22-Positive B-Lineage Acute Lymphoblastic LeukemiaPHASE2 · Recruiting · National Cancer Institute (NCI) · Birmingham, Alabama