Impact of Comparing Treatment Status With Other CPAP Users
- Sponsor
- Kimihiko Murase
- Study ID
- NCT07124975
- Status
- Enrolling By Invitation
Conditions
- Obstructive Sleep Apnea
- Sleep Apnea
Eligibility Criteria
- Sex
- ALL
- Age
- 20 Years - N/A
- Healthy Volunteers
- Not accepted
Interventions
- Comparison of the treatment data with other patients — BEHAVIORALIn this group, feedback will be provided as in the routine treatment data feedback group. In addition to this information, aggregated results for all participants (proportion of days with CPAP usage ≥4 hours per day and average daily usage time) and the participant's ranking based on these aggregated data will also be provided as feedback.
- CPAP data feedback — BEHAVIORALParticipants will receive monthly feedback on their CPAP therapy treatment data (usage time and the proportion of days with \>4 hours of use) via mail or email for 6 months.
Study Details
The objective of this study is to evaluate whether comparing a patient's own CPAP usage data with that of other patients improves CPAP adherence in patients who have been undergoing long-term CPAP therapy for sleep apnea. Eligible participants are patients who have been on CPAP therapy with remote monitoring of treatment data enabled for at least three months. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups: (1) routine treatment data feedback group, or (2) treatment data comparison group. In both groups, feedback will be provided to participants by mail on monthly basis, including the proportion of days with CPAP usage ≥4 hours per day and the average daily CPAP usage time. In the treatment data comparison group, in addition to this information, aggregated results for all participants (proportion of days with CPAP usage ≥4 hours per day and average daily usage time) and the participant's ranking based on these aggregated data will also be provided as feedback. The observation period will be six months after initiation of the intervention, and changes in treatment adherence before and after the intervention will be assessed.
Key Dates
- First listed
- Aug 15, 2025
- Start date
- Oct 1, 2025
- Status verified
- Dec 2025
- Primary completion
- Dec 31, 2027
- Completion
- Jun 30, 2028
Study Design
- Enrollment
- 186 participants (estimated)
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Intervention model
- PARALLEL
- Primary purpose
- SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Arms
- Active Comparator: Routine treatment data feedback groupIn this group, feedback will be provided to participants by mail on monthly basis, including the proportion of days with CPAP usage ≥4 hours per day and the average daily CPAP usage time.
- Experimental: Treatment data comparison groupIn this group, feedback will be provided as in the routine treatment data feedback group. In addition to this information, aggregated results for all participants (proportion of days with CPAP usage ≥4 hours per day and average daily usage time) and the participant's ranking based on these aggregated data will also be provided as feedback.
Primary Outcome Measure
Number of participants with improvement in CPAP adherence [ Time Frame: 6 months from the start of the interventions ]
Related Studies
- Computer Models of Airways in Children and Young Adults With Sleep Apnea and Down SyndromeEnrolling By Invitation · Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati · Cincinnati, Ohio
- Magnetic Apnea Prevention(MAGNAP) Device to Treat Obstructive Sleep Apnea:First-In-Human Study of Feasibility and SafetyRecruiting · Michael Harrison · San Francisco, California
- Effect of Oxymetazoline Hydrochloride in Combination With Fluticasone Propionate on the Apnea Hypopnea Index (AHI) in Subject With Persistent Nasal Congestion and Mild Obstructive Sleep ApneaPHASE4 · Recruiting · University of South Florida · Tampa, Florida
- Neurocognitive and Health Impact of Sleep Apnea in Elderly Veterans With Comorbid COPDRecruiting · VA Office of Research and Development · Detroit, Michigan