The Impact of Low Versus High Positive End-expiratory Pressure on Diaphragm Function, Ventilation Efficiency, and Lung Mechanics
- Sponsor
- Vastra Gotaland Region
- Study ID
- NCT07188038
- Status
- Not Yet Recruiting
Notify me when recruiting opens
Save your spot on the interest list for this study. We'll keep your details with this study so our team can follow up when recruiting opens.
Add your contact details and location so we can keep your interest tied to this study.
Conditions
- ARDS (Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome)
- Pneumonia
- Respiratory Failure
- Respiratory Insufficiency
Eligibility Criteria
- Sex
- ALL
- Age
- 18 Years - N/A
- Healthy Volunteers
- Not accepted
Interventions
- Low positive end-expiratory pressure — PROCEDURELow (4 cmH2O) positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) will be applied during pressure support ventilation. The PEEP level will be kept for 10 minutes prior to data acquisition.
- Medium positive end-expiratory pressure — PROCEDUREMedium (10 cmH2O) positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) will be applied during pressure support ventilation. The PEEP level will be kept for 10 minutes prior to data acquisition.
- High positive end-expiratory pressure — PROCEDUREHigh(16 cmH2O) positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) will be applied during pressure support ventilation. The PEEP level will be kept for 10 minutes prior to data acquisition.
Study Details
The goal of this interventional study is to evaluate the effect of different positive end-expiratory pressures (PEEP) on lung and diaphragm function in patients mechanically ventilated with pressure support ventilation in the intensive care unit. The main questions aim to answer: Does higher PEEP level affect diaphragm contractions and ventilatory efficiency? Does higher PEEP level limit inspiratory efforts? Does higher PEEP level affect lung compliance? The participants will be subjected to three different PEEP levels during pressure support ventilation: Low PEEP (4 cmH2O), Medium PEEP (10 cmH2O), High PEEP (16 cmH2O). The lung and diaphragm function will be evaluated using high-resolution esophageal manometry, electrical activity of the diaphragm, external diaphragm ultrasound and spirometric ventilator data.
Key Dates
- First listed
- Sep 23, 2025
- Start date
- Oct 1, 2025
- Status verified
- Sep 2025
- Primary completion
- Jul 31, 2027
- Completion
- Dec 31, 2027
Study Design
- Enrollment
- 25 participants (estimated)
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Intervention model
- CROSSOVER
- Primary purpose
- SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Arms
- Experimental: Low PEEPLow positive end-expiratory pressure (4 cmH2O)
- Experimental: Medium PEEPMedium positive end-expiratory pressure (10 cmH2O)
- Experimental: High PEEPHigh positive end-expiratory pressure (16 cmH2O)
Primary Outcome Measure
Inspiratory effort [ Time Frame: Measured during 5 uninterrupted breaths 10 minutes after application of interventional PEEP level ]
Central Contacts
- Hannes Widing0046703957374
- Per Persson
Related Studies
- Natural History, Management, and Genetics of the Hyperimmunoglobulin E Recurrent Infection Syndrome (HIES)Recruiting · National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) · Bethesda, Maryland
- Study of Lung Proteins in Patients With PneumoniaRecruiting · National Institutes of Health Clinical Center (CC) · Bethesda, Maryland
- The Role of Circadian Clock Proteins in Innate and Adaptive ImmunityRecruiting · Washington University School of Medicine · St Louis, Missouri
- Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Safety Profile of Understudied Drugs Administered to Children Per Standard of Care (POPS)Recruiting · Duke University · Little Rock, Arkansas