Road Mapping Guided Puncture Versus Ultrasound Guided Puncture During Retrograde Angioplasty Feasibility and Safety

Sponsor
Sohag University
Study ID
NCT07427108
Status
Recruiting
Apply to this trial

Conditions

  • Peripheral Arterial Disease
  • Vascular Diseases

Eligibility Criteria

Sex
ALL
Age
18 Years - N/A
Healthy Volunteers
Not accepted

Interventions

  • Road-map guided versus US guided retrograde access — PROCEDURE
    Road-map guided versus US guided retrograde access

Study Details

The study aims to compare the technical feasibility and safety of road mapping-guided versus ultrasound-guided retrograde arterial puncture in patients with (CLTI) as measured by: * Puncture success rate * Access-related complication rate (e.g., hematoma, vessel dissection, perforation)

Key Dates

First listed
Feb 23, 2026
Start date
Feb 1, 2026
Status verified
Feb 2026
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2026
Completion
Mar 1, 2027

Study Design

Enrollment
32 participants (estimated)
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT

Arms

  • Experimental: Road Mapping Guided Puncture
  • Active Comparator: Ultrasound Guided Puncture

Primary Outcome Measure

Success rate [ Time Frame: 12 months ]

Central Contacts

Related Studies