KPAP vs EPR for Efficacy
- Sponsor
- SleepRes Inc.
- Study ID
- NCT07530523
- Status
- Not Yet Recruiting
Notify me when recruiting opens
Save your spot on the interest list for this study. We'll keep your details with this study so our team can follow up when recruiting opens.
Add your contact details and location so we can keep your interest tied to this study.
Conditions
- Obstructive Sleep Apnea
Eligibility Criteria
- Sex
- ALL
- Age
- 20 Years - 80 Years
- Healthy Volunteers
- Not accepted
Interventions
- APAP + KPAP — DEVICEA SleepRes device will deliver auto-adjusting positive airway pressure (APAP) + Kairos PAP at the maximum drop (1, 2, 3, 4, 5 cmH2O at background pressures of 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 cmH2O, respectively)
- APAP + EPR — DEVICEA ResMed device will deliver auto-adjusting positive airway pressure (APAP) + Expiratory Pressure Relief set on level 3
Study Details
The KPAP EPR is a randomized, crossover study in which treatment efficacy will be compared between SleepRes CPAP + KPAP and ResMed CPAP + EPR. Participants will be chosen from those with a recent OSA diagnosis (following an in-lab polysomnogram, a split-night study or a home sleep apnea test) and with no previous use of OS therapy (PAP-naïve). Upon signing an informed consent, participants will be scheduled to come to the sleep laboratory for a manual titration on CPAP. Once the therapeutic pressure is determined, participants will be randomized to start either CPAP + KPAP (delivered by a SleepRes device) or CPAP + EPR (delivered by a ResMed device). Participants will be blinded to the sequence order. They will then be invited to the laboratory for two overnight sleep studies, one on each treatment device, in the order determined by the randomization, with a minimum washout of 1 week and a maximum of 3 weeks. Both studies will use the therapeutic pressure determined during manual titration. The KPAP drop will be set to the maximum level (i.e., 5 cmH2O), while EPR will be set on 3. The next morning of each sleep study, participants will be administered visual analog scale (VAS) questionnaires to examine subjective sleep quality (1=best sleep quality; 10=worst sleep quality) and, after all studies are completed a device subjective preference (1=CPAP+KPAP was extremely better than CPAP+EPR; 10=the opposite). The study will be single blinded with both the participants (the device will be concealed in the laboratory so that participants will not be able to understand what treatment they are on) and the registered technician scoring the polysomnographies blinded to treatment allocation.
Key Dates
- First listed
- Apr 15, 2026
- Start date
- Jul 1, 2026
- Status verified
- Apr 2026
- Primary completion
- Dec 1, 2026
- Completion
- Dec 31, 2026
Study Design
- Enrollment
- 24 participants (estimated)
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Intervention model
- CROSSOVER
- Primary purpose
- TREATMENT
Arms
- Experimental: APAP + KPAPAuto-adjusting positive airway pressure + Kairos PAP
- Active Comparator: APAP + EPRAuto-adjusting positive airway pressure + Expiratory Pressure Relief
Primary Outcome Measure
Treatment efficacy [ Time Frame: This outcome will be evaluated after one night of treatment ]
Central Contacts
- William Noah, MD6153946624
Related Studies
- Computer Models of Airways in Children and Young Adults With Sleep Apnea and Down SyndromeEnrolling By Invitation · Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati · Cincinnati, Ohio
- Magnetic Apnea Prevention(MAGNAP) Device to Treat Obstructive Sleep Apnea:First-In-Human Study of Feasibility and SafetyRecruiting · Michael Harrison · San Francisco, California
- Neurocognitive and Health Impact of Sleep Apnea in Elderly Veterans With Comorbid COPDRecruiting · VA Office of Research and Development · Detroit, Michigan
- Predicting Cardiometabolic Risk in Mild-to-Moderate Obstructive Sleep Apnea: Inflammation vs. Apnea/Hypopnea IndexEnrolling By Invitation · Milton S. Hershey Medical Center · Hershey, Pennsylvania