AI-enabled Communication to Advance Research Engagement (AI-CARE)

Part of paid clinical trials in The Bronx, New York.

Sponsor
Albert Einstein College of Medicine
Study ID
NCT07788898
Status
Not Yet Recruiting

Notify me when recruiting opens

Save your spot on the interest list for this study. We'll keep your details with this study so our team can follow up when recruiting opens.

Not yet recruiting

Add your contact details and location so we can keep your interest tied to this study.

Conditions

  • AI Literacy
  • Research Communication

Eligibility Criteria

Sex
ALL
Age
18 Years - N/A
Healthy Volunteers
Accepted

Interventions

  • Community co-created AI summaries — BEHAVIORAL
    Participants review AI-generated summaries refined through iterative collaboration between researchers and community members using community-engaged co-design principles.
  • Experimental: Researcher prompt engineering — BEHAVIORAL
    Participants review AI-generated summaries generated after researchers complete AI prompt-engineering training and develop optimized prompts.
  • Experimental: Standard AI prompt — BEHAVIORAL
    Participants review plain-language research summaries generated using a standardized AI prompt without researcher prompt engineering or community co-design.
  • AI literacy training and co-design — BEHAVIORAL
    The co-designed summaries which result from this process will become one of the three intervention conditions evaluated in Aim 3.

Study Details

The objective of AI-CARE is to train researchers and community members to use artificial intelligence (AI) to create plain-language summaries of research studies and to determine whether a co-creation process for developing these summaries improves understanding and relevance of the research, confidence in AI and in institutions, and AI literacy. The hypothesis is that AI-generated research summaries, co-developed with researchers and community partners, will significantly improve confidence in research and institutions, understanding and accessibility of the research, and appropriateness of the summary compared with standard researcher-generated materials, and that the educational and co-creation process will build community members' AI literacy and confidence in using AI, as well as researchers' readiness to use and comfort with using AI for communicating research.

Key Dates

First listed
Aug 27, 2026
Start date
Sep 1, 2026
Status verified
Aug 2026
Primary completion
Sep 1, 2028
Completion
Sep 1, 2028

Study Design

Enrollment
250 participants (estimated)
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER

Arms

  • Experimental: Standard AI prompt - Aim 3
    Participants receive plain-language research summaries generated using a standardized AI prompt without researcher prompt engineering or community co-design.
  • Experimental: Researcher prompt engineering - Aim 3
    Participants receive summaries generated after researchers complete AI prompt-engineering training and develop optimized prompts.
  • Experimental: Community co-created AI summaries - Aim 3
    Participants receive summaries developed through an iterative community-researcher co-creation process following AI training and structured co-design sessions.
  • Experimental: Co-creation cohort - Aim 2
    Participants will be divided into three groups, each assigned 1-2 research summaries, and will engage in structured co-creation sessions. The goals of will be to: 1) define readability and appropriateness, 2) review AI-generated drafts produced by the summary engine, and 3) provide feedback to refine prompts and outputs. Several iteration cycles will be conducted as needed, with documentation of any changes and the rationale for making decisions. In this way the team will develop a modular AI "summary engine" that transforms research products (e.g., manuscripts) into draft community-facing materials using co-created prompts and templates. Co-creation will be conducted during one or two facilitated sessions. Each session will include structured review of drafts, guided discussion, and documented decisions regarding readability, transparency, visuals or graphics, etc. Iteration cycles will continue until pre-specified stopping criteria are met.

Primary Outcome Measure

Confidence in medical research and researchers - Aim 3 [ Time Frame: Immediately following review of research summary, up to 1 hour ]

Central Contacts

Locations (1)

FacilityCityStateZIPSite coordinators
Albert Einstein College of MedicineThe BronxNew York10461-

Find similar trials in The Bronx, NY