Hinge vs CCK Implants
Part of paid clinical trials in Washington D.C., District of Columbia.
- Sponsor
- Medstar Health Research Institute
- Study ID
- NCT07818343
- Status
- Recruiting
Conditions
- Knee
- Revision Arthroplasty
Eligibility Criteria
- Sex
- ALL
- Age
- 18 Years - 80 Years
- Healthy Volunteers
- Not accepted
Interventions
- Condylar Constrained knee system. ( NexGen Legacy Condylar Constrained Knee by Zimmer Biomet) — DEVICEPatients in this group will receive a condylar constrained knee implant at the time of surgery and will have their outcomes with this implant assessed over 10 years.
- Rotating Hinge Knee ( NexGen Rotating Hinge Knee by Zimmer Biomet) — DEVICEPatients in this group will receive a rotating hinge knee implant and will be followed for the next 10 years to asses outcomes.
Study Details
The primary purpose of this study is to compare reoperation rates for rotating hinge knee implants versus condylar constrained knee implants when used in revision total knee arthroplasty. The secondary purposes are to compare patient satisfaction, loosening rates and clinical outcomes for RHK implants compared to CCK implants in rTKA. Additionally, knee range of motion and stability will be assessed and compared at all follow-up time points. We hypothesize that RHK implants provide patients undergoing rTKA with similar reoperation rates to those of patients who receive a CCK implant. The investigators hypothesize that patients who receive an RHK implant will have similar loosening rates and clinical outcomes compared to patients who receive a CCK implant. Lastly, knee stability and patient satisfaction may improve with the use of a rotating hinge device.
Key Dates
- First listed
- Sep 14, 2026
- Start date
- Feb 1, 2026
- Status verified
- Jan 2026
- Primary completion
- Jan 31, 2037
- Completion
- Jan 31, 2037
Study Design
- Enrollment
- 186 participants (estimated)
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Intervention model
- PARALLEL
- Primary purpose
- TREATMENT
Arms
- Active Comparator: Condylar Constrained KneePatients in this arm will receive a condylar constrained implant.
- Active Comparator: Rotating Hinge KneePatients in this arm will receive a rotating hinge knee implant.
Primary Outcome Measure
Reoperation Rate [ Time Frame: From time of surgery to end of study. Investigators will plan to assess for reoperation at routine standard of care visits at the following time points: 6 weeks postoperatively, 6 months, 1 year, and then annually for 8 years ]
Central Contacts
- Miles Hollimon, B.S.(202) 444-8766
Locations (2)
| Facility | City | State | ZIP | Site coordinators |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Medstar Georgetown University Hospital | Washington D.C. | District of Columbia | 20007 | Brett R Levine, M.D. (PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR) |
| Medstar Montgomery Medical Center | Olney | Maryland | 20832 | Katharine Harper, M.D. (PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR) |
Find similar trials in Washington D.C., DC
Related Studies
- Patient Outcomes With Robotic-Assisted Total Knee ArthroplastyEnrolling By Invitation · Corin · Flagstaff, Arizona
- Restoration of Knee Extension After ACL ReconstructionPHASE1 · Not Yet Recruiting · University of Alabama at Birmingham · Birmingham, Alabama