Effects of Pork Protein on Recovery Following Simulated Fireground Activity
Part of paid clinical trials in Fort Worth, Texas.
- Sponsor
- Sam Houston State University
- Study ID
- NCT07819565
- Status
- Recruiting
Conditions
- Blood Biomarkers
- Cognition
- Exercise Recovery
- Muscle Damage
- Physical Performance Parameters
- Stress
Eligibility Criteria
- Sex
- ALL
- Age
- 18 Years - 60 Years
- Healthy Volunteers
- Accepted
Interventions
- Pork-Based Protein Ready-to-Eat Meals — OTHERPork-Based Protein Ready-to-Eat Meals: Participants will consume study-provided ready-to-eat meals (RTEM) in which lean pork serves as the primary protein source. Meals are designed to provide approximately 700 - 800 kcal, 80 g carbohydrate, 50 g protein, and 30 g fat per meal, with total daily protein intake targeted at approximately 1.4-2.0 g/kg/day. Pork-based meals will be provided during the approximately 3-day experimental period surrounding the simulated fire ground test and subsequent recovery assessments. Meals are designed to match the energy and macronutrient content of the plant-based protein condition.
- Plant-Based Protein Ready-to-Eat Meals — OTHERPlant-Based Protein Ready-to-Eat Meals: Participants will consume study-provided ready-to-eat meals (RTEM) in which plant-based foods serve as the primary protein source. Plant protein sources may include soy, tempeh, tofu, and other soy-based foods. Meals are designed to provide approximately 700 - 800 kcal, 80 g carbohydrate, 50 g protein, and 30 g fat per meal, with total daily protein intake targeted at approximately 1.4-2.0 g/kg/day. Plant-based meals will be provided during the approximately 3-day experimental period surrounding the simulated fire ground test and subsequent recovery assessments and will be matched as closely as feasible to the pork-based condition for energy and macronutrient content.
- Carbohydrate-Focused Lower-Protein Ready-to-Eat Meals — OTHERCarbohydrate-Focused Lower-Protein Ready-to-Eat Meals: Participants will consume study-provided carbohydrate-focused ready-to-eat meals (RTEM) designed to provide a lower total daily protein intake of approximately 0.8 g/kg/day. This condition serves as the lower-protein dietary control for comparison with the pork-based and plant-based higher-protein conditions. Meals will be provided during the approximately 3-day experimental period surrounding the simulated fire ground test and subsequent recovery assessments.
Study Details
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether consuming pork-based protein before and after physically demanding simulated firefighting activities can improve recovery, physical performance, and cognitive performance in healthy adult firefighters. The study will also compare pork-based protein meals with plant-based protein meals and a carbohydrate-focused control condition. The main questions this study aims to answer are: Does consuming pork-based protein reduce changes in markers of muscle damage, physiological stress, and muscle soreness following a simulated fire ground test? Does consuming pork-based protein help maintain or improve physical and cognitive performance during recovery compared with plant-based protein and a carbohydrate-focused control condition? Researchers will compare three ready-to-eat meal conditions: pork-based protein, plant-based protein, and a carbohydrate-focused control condition. Each participant will complete all three conditions in a randomized crossover design, with 14 to 21 days between conditions.
Key Dates
- First listed
- Sep 15, 2026
- Start date
- Jun 1, 2026
- Status verified
- Sep 2026
- Primary completion
- Nov 30, 2026
- Completion
- Dec 31, 2026
Study Design
- Enrollment
- 20 participants (estimated)
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Intervention model
- CROSSOVER
- Primary purpose
- TREATMENT
Arms
- Experimental: Pork-Based Protein Ready-to-Eat MealsParticipants will consume pork-based protein ready-to-eat meals (RTEM) during this experimental condition. Meals will provide approximately 700.- 800 kcal, 80 g carbohydrate, 50 g protein, and 30 g fat per meal, with lean pork serving as the primary protein source. The dietary intervention is designed to provide a total daily protein intake consistent with study targets. Participants will consume the study-provided meals surrounding the simulated fire ground testing and recovery period, with physiological, cognitive, and physical performance outcomes assessed during recovery.
- Active Comparator: Plant-Based Protein Ready-to-Eat MealsParticipants will consume plant-based protein ready-to-eat meals (RTEM) during this comparator condition. Meals will be designed to approximate the energy and macronutrient content of the pork-based condition, providing approximately 700-800 kcal, 80 g carbohydrate, 50 g protein, and 30 g fat per meal, with plant-based foods such as soy, tempeh, or tofu as the primary protein sources. Participants will consume the study-provided meals surrounding the simulated fire ground testing and recovery period, with the same physiological, cognitive, and physical performance outcomes assessed.
- Active Comparator: Carbohydrate-Focused Lower-Protein ControlParticipants will consume carbohydrate-focused ready-to-eat meals during the control condition. This condition will provide a lower total daily protein intake of approximately 0.8 g/kg/day and will serve as a dietary control for comparison with the higher-protein pork-based and plant-based conditions. Participants will consume the study-provided meals surrounding the simulated fire ground testing and recovery period, with the same physiological, cognitive, and physical performance outcomes assessed.
Primary Outcome Measure
Change in Testosterone and Cortisol [ Time Frame: Baseline, 24, 48, and 72 hours following the simulated fire ground test ]
Central Contacts
- Drew Edward Gonzalez, PhD2107888616
Locations (2)
| Facility | City | State | ZIP | Site coordinators |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bob Bolen Public Safety Complex Administration | Fort Worth | Texas | 76115 | |
| Sam Houston State University | Huntsville | Texas | 77340 | Andrew Wolfe, EdD (SUB_INVESTIGATOR) Nick Barringer, PhD (SUB_INVESTIGATOR) Richard B Kreider, PhD (SUB_INVESTIGATOR) Brian Newman, PhD (SUB_INVESTIGATOR) Austin Graybeal, PhD (SUB_INVESTIGATOR) |
Find similar trials in Fort Worth, TX
Related Studies
- Smartphone-based Cognitive Emotion Regulation Training for Unpaid Primary Caregivers of Persons With Alzheimer's DiseaseRecruiting · Bryan Denny · Houston, Texas
- A Randomized Controlled Trial to Assess the Impact of Live and Recorded Music-Based Interventions on Pre-operative Stress, Mood, Pain and Biomarkers, in Neurosurgical Patients (Music-STAR Trial)Recruiting · M.D. Anderson Cancer Center · Houston, Texas
- Asthma Intervention With Residential Ventilation and Air Cleaner (AIRVAC) StudyRecruiting · The University of Texas at Arlington · Arlington, Texas
- EEG-Guided Binaural Beat Audio to Reduce Performance-Related Stress and Improve CognitionRecruiting · Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center · Lubbock, Texas