Effect of Osteopathic Intervention on Migraine
- Sponsor
- Escola Superior de Tecnologia da Saúde do Porto
- Study ID
- NCT07542340
- Status
- Not Yet Recruiting
Notify me when recruiting opens
Save your spot on the interest list for this study. We'll keep your details with this study so our team can follow up when recruiting opens.
Add your contact details and location so we can keep your interest tied to this study.
Conditions
Eligibility Criteria
- Sex
- ALL
- Age
- 18 Years - 50 Years
- Healthy Volunteers
- Not accepted
Interventions
- Osteopathic Intervention Protocol — OTHERStarting by locating the C2 segment with the metacarpophalangeal joint of the second finger, whilst the other hand rested on the participant's face, homolateral inclination and contralateral rotation were induced, applying a thrust directed into rotation. In this phase, two attempts were made on each side, starting with the right side. In the second phase, the suboccipital inhibition technique was performed in the occipital region, using contact with the thenar and hypothenar eminences, positioning the distal metacarpophalangeal joints at the level of the superior nuchal line, over the suboccipital musculature, promoting gentle pressure towards the ceiling, associated with cephalic traction, lasting for three minutes.
- Placebo technique — OTHERThe researcher was positioned at the head of the table, making bilateral contact with the acromioclavicular joint and maintaining this position for 3 minutes, assisted by a stopwatch.
Study Details
Migraine is a common, disabling neurological condition characterized by severe, often unilateral pain accompanied by sensory symptoms like nausea and photophobia. Its pathophysiology involves activation of the trigeminovascular system, neuro-inflammation, and nervous system sensitisation. Due to the convergence of trigeminal and cervical nerves in the upper neck (C2), manual therapy may influence migraine symptoms. Osteopathic techniques, such as suboccipital inhibition and C2 manipulation, aim to reduce pain intensity and frequency by normalising mobility and reducing nociceptive stimulation. While promising, further research is needed to validate these interventions through rigorous clinical trials.
Key Dates
- First listed
- Apr 21, 2026
- Start date
- Jun 30, 2026
- Status verified
- Apr 2026
- Primary completion
- Aug 31, 2026
- Completion
- Sep 30, 2026
Study Design
- Enrollment
- 45 participants (estimated)
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Intervention model
- PARALLEL
- Primary purpose
- TREATMENT
Arms
- Placebo Comparator: Control groupIn the control group, bilateral contact of the acromioclavicular joint was performed.
- Experimental: Experimental groupThe intervention consisted of two phases: a structural technique involving a high-velocity, low-amplitude thrust on segment C2 (Tixa \& Ebenegger, 2016), followed by a functional suboccipital inhibition technique (Chamtepie \& Pérot, 2008).
Primary Outcome Measure
Headache Impact Test [ Time Frame: Two weeks after the third intervention ]
Central Contacts
- Natália MO Campelo, PhD+351 222 061 000
Find similar trials
Related Studies
- Quality Improvement and Practice Based Research in Neurology Using the EMRPHASE4 · Enrolling By Invitation · Endeavor Health · Evanston, Illinois
- Pain Biomarker StudyPHASE1 · Enrolling By Invitation · The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston · Houston, Texas
- Objectively Diagnose and Monitor Treatment of Light SensitivityRecruiting · Randy Kardon · Iowa City, Iowa
- Mind Body Balance for Pediatric MigraineRecruiting · Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati · Cincinnati, Ohio