Study of TARCEVA (Erlotinib) as Adjuvant Treatment for Locally Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Part of paid clinical trials in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
- Sponsor
- University of Pittsburgh
- Study ID
- NCT01515137
- Phase
- PHASE1
- Status
- Completed
Conditions
Eligibility Criteria
- Sex
- ALL
- Age
- 18 Years - N/A
- Healthy Volunteers
- Not accepted
Interventions
- Erlotinib — DRUGErlotinib (150 mg PO QD) plus sulindac (150 mg PO BID) (Arm A), Erlotinib (150 mg PO QD) (Arm B) or placebo (for Erlotinib) QD (Arm C).
- Erlotinib plus sulindac — DRUGErlotinib (150 mg PO QD) plus sulindac (150 mg PO BID) (Arm A), Erlotinib (150 mg PO QD) (Arm B) or placebo (for Erlotinib) QD (Arm C).
- Placebo — DRUGErlotinib (150 mg PO QD) plus sulindac (150 mg PO BID) (Arm A), Erlotinib (150 mg PO QD) (Arm B) or placebo (for Erlotinib) QD (Arm C).
Study Details
This trial was originally designed and powered to compare biomarker modulation in the neo-adjuvant setting (erlotinib versus erlotinib plus sulindac versus placebo) with clinical response to erlotinib in the adjuvant setting. Since implementing the trial in late 2005, The investigators have encountered significant obstacles to implementing the adjuvant therapy phase of the trial. * Barriers included: 1. disease recurrence 2. patient refusal to take the agent 3. patient refusal to travel to Pittsburgh for clinical evaluations. Given the institutional challenges to implement and complete the adjuvant portion, the investigators have decided to change the primary endpoint to a biomarker modulation endpoint. To achieve this goal, the investigators determined that they needed 39 paired tissue specimens (see statistical justification below). The central hypothesis to be tested in this study is that persistent activation of parallel and/or downstream pathways contributes to tumor progression in the setting of EGFR blockade. While not all head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients will respond to EGFR targeting, the optimal strategy to identify those subjects whose tumors are sensitive to EGFR inhibition remains unknown. The primary objective is centered around the concept of tumor biomarkers which may be modulated by EGFR and Cox-2 inhibitors and may serve as future therapeutic targets for therapy. To this end patients on this trial will be randomly assigned to one of three arms to receive either Tarceva, Tarceva plus sulindac, or a placebo in the 2 week pre-operative period. A panel of biomarkers will be obtained by biopsy prior to pre-operative therapy and again at surgery. Biomarkers will be examined for modulation in the 2-week pre-operative period, for group differences, for treatment effects and for further understanding of protein signaling pathways. Sample size for the primary objective Modification of Statistical Design: The primary endpoint is the difference between pre (biopsy) and post (surgery). There are 3 hypotheses of interest: (1) placebo vs erlotinib alone, (2) placebo versus erlotinib plus sulindac, and (3) erlotinib vs erlotinib + sulindac. With a randomization in a 3:5:5 ratio, we have 88% power, alpha = .01 for an omnibus test to show between-group differences of 1 log exist. This requires 39 patients. Basically, 39 patients will provide the ability to detect a one log difference between any 2 of the 3 groups in pre-post change.
Key Dates
- First listed
- Jan 23, 2012
- Start date
- Nov 30, 2005
- Status verified
- Jan 2016
- Primary completion
- Sep 30, 2014
- Completion
- Sep 30, 2014
Study Design
- Enrollment
- 47 participants (actual)
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Intervention model
- PARALLEL
- Primary purpose
- TREATMENT
Arms
- Experimental: Arm A erlotinib plus sulindacerlotinib (150 mg PO QD) plus sulindac (150 mg PO BID) (Arm A),
- Experimental: Arm B erlotiniberlotinib (150 mg PO QD) (Arm B)
- Experimental: Arm Cplacebo (for Erlotinib) QD (Arm C).
Primary Outcome Measure
Phase II Study of TARCEVA (Erlotinib) as Adjuvant Treatment for Locally Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma with Evaluation of Neoadjuvant Biomarker Modulation with TARCEVA vs. TARCEVA Plus Sulindac [ Time Frame: 10 years ]
Locations (1)
| Facility | City | State | ZIP | Site coordinators |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute | Pittsburgh | Pennsylvania | 15232 | - |
Find similar trials in Pittsburgh, PA
Related Studies
- Radiation Therapy With or Without Cisplatin in Treating Patients With Stage III-IVA Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck Who Have Undergone SurgeryPHASE2 · Recruiting · ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group · Birmingham, Alabama
- VMD-928 Monotherapy and in Combination With Pembrolizumab to Treat TrkA Overexpression Driven Solid Tumors or LymphomaPHASE1/PHASE2 · Recruiting · VM Oncology, LLC · Santa Rosa, California
- Study of Safety and Tolerability of BCA101 Monotherapy and in Combination Therapy in Patients With EGFR-driven Advanced Solid TumorsPHASE1 · Recruiting · Bicara Therapeutics · La Jolla, California
- Virtual Reality 3D-Surgery Modeling to Enhance Head and Neck Cancer Surgery QualityRecruiting · Thomas Jefferson University · Philadelphia, Pennsylvania