A Randomized Phase 2 Study of Atezolizumab (an Engineered Anti-PDL1 Antibody) Compared With Docetaxel in Participants With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Who Have Failed Platinum Therapy - "POPLAR"
Part of paid clinical trials in Tucson, Arizona.
- Sponsor
- Hoffmann-La Roche
- Study ID
- NCT01903993
- Phase
- PHASE2
- Status
- Completed
Conditions
Eligibility Criteria
- Sex
- ALL
- Age
- 18 Years - N/A
- Healthy Volunteers
- Not accepted
Interventions
- Docetaxel — DRUGParticipants received starting dose of 75 mg/m\^2 every three week (q3w) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or death. Dose modifications were according to the locally approved label. Participants randomized to receive docetaxel had to be premedicated with corticosteroids according to local practice.
- Atezolizumab — DRUGParticipants received atezolizumab of 1200 mg (equivalent to an average body weight-based dose of 15 milligram per kilogram \[mg/kg\]) which was administered by IV infusion q3w on Day 1 of each 21 day cycle. Participants were allowed to continue treatment beyond progression per response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) v1.1 if they were experiencing clinical benefit per investigator, did not have a decline in performance status, did not have signs or symptoms of unequivocal progression, did not have tumor progression at critical sites, and signed an informed consent signature page acknowledging deferment any standard treatment options that may exist in favor of continuing atezolizumab.
Study Details
This multicenter, open-label, randomized study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of Atezolizumab compared with docetaxel in participants with advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer after platinum failure. Participants will be randomized to receive either Atezolizumab 1200 milligram (mg) intravenously every 3 weeks or docetaxel 75 milligram per meter square (mg/m\^2) intravenously every 3 weeks. Treatment with Atezolizumab may be continued as long as participants are experiencing clinical benefit as assessed by the investigator, i.e., in the absence of unacceptable toxicity or symptomatic deterioration attributed to disease progression.
Key Dates
- Start date
- Aug 6, 2013
- Status verified
- Sep 2019
- Primary completion
- Nov 19, 2015
- Completion
- Sep 6, 2018
Study Design
- Enrollment
- 287 participants (actual)
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Intervention model
- PARALLEL
- Primary purpose
- TREATMENT
Arms
- Active Comparator: DocetaxelParticipants received docetaxel 75 milligram per meter square (mg/m\^2) administered intravenously on Day 1 of each 21 day cycle until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity or death.
- Experimental: AtezolizumabParticipants were administered atezolizumab intravenously on Day 1 of each 21 day cycle at a fixed dose of 1200 mg. Atezolizumab treatment were to continued as long as participants were experiencing clinical benefit as assessed by the investigator.
Primary Outcome Measure
Overall Survival (OS) [ Time Frame: From the time of randomization to the date of death due to any cause or up to data cut off date: 01 Dec 2015 (up to 28 months) ]
Locations (29)
Find similar trials in Tucson, AZ
Related Studies
- Cabozantinib in Patients With RET Fusion-Positive Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and Those With Other Genotypes: ROS1 or NTRK Fusions or Increased MET or AXL ActivityPHASE2 · Recruiting · Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · Basking Ridge, New Jersey
- JoLT-Ca Sublobar Resection (SR) Versus Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy (SAbR) for Lung CancerPHASE3 · Recruiting · University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · La Jolla, California
- Early Rebiopsy to Identify Biomarkers of Tumor Cell Survival Following EGFR, ALK, ROS1 or BRAF TKI TherapyRecruiting · University of Colorado, Denver · Aurora, Colorado
- VMD-928 Monotherapy and in Combination With Pembrolizumab to Treat TrkA Overexpression Driven Solid Tumors or LymphomaPHASE1/PHASE2 · Recruiting · VM Oncology, LLC · Santa Rosa, California