Clinical Study of Acupuncture Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis
- Sponsor
- Wu zenan
- Study ID
- NCT06805188
- Status
- Recruiting
Conditions
- Osteoarthritis
- Osteoarthritis (OA) of the Knee
- Osteoarthritis of the Knees
Eligibility Criteria
- Sex
- ALL
- Age
- 18 Years - 70 Years
- Healthy Volunteers
- Not accepted
Interventions
- Acupuncture — OTHERThe intervention was performed by two licensed acupuncturists with at least 10 years of clinical experience who received two weeks of training in standardized intervention methods prior to the trial. Acupoints location refers to the WHO Standard Acupuncture Point Locations in the Western Pacific Region (WHO Standard)〔41〕.The acupuncture group will receive the following acupoints (Figure 3, Table 2): the affected side of Chize(LU5), Quchi (LI11), Dubi (ST35), Fengshi (GB31), and Xiyangguan (GB33). Needling was performed with 0.30mm x 40mm disposable Huatuo brand sterile acupuncture needles.After the needles were inserted, needle manipulation was performed at all acupuncture points to achieve the sensations of soreness, numbness, distension, and heaviness.Each acupoint was manipulated for about 30 seconds, and the acupuncture treatment was performed for one 30-minute session.
- Sham acupuncture — OTHERThe device's sham needling operation mimics real needling through appearance and tactile sensation, making it difficult for patients to distinguish, meeting the requirement of blinding and effectively controlling the patients' cognitive bias towards the type of intervention. Patients in the sham acupuncture group received this sham acupuncture intervention, which was designed to ensure that only the actual biological effects of acupuncture differed between the experimental group and the control group, and to exclude the psychological implication effects caused by the patients' expectation effects or the operation itself, so as to enhance the scientific validity and reliability of the research results.
Study Details
The main question of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of acupuncture in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis (KOA) through a single-blind, randomized controlled trial divided into two groups. Patients in both groups received a total of 24 acupuncture treatments over an 8-week period. The differences in knee NRS score, WOMAC index, walking test, mental health assessment and other indicators between the acupuncture group and the sham acupuncture group before and after treatment were compared to provide high-quality evidence to support the effectiveness of acupuncture in treating KOA.
Key Dates
- First listed
- Feb 3, 2025
- Start date
- Feb 15, 2025
- Status verified
- Jan 2025
- Primary completion
- Jan 5, 2026
- Completion
- Jan 5, 2026
Study Design
- Enrollment
- 350 participants (estimated)
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Intervention model
- SINGLE_GROUP
- Primary purpose
- TREATMENT
Arms
- Experimental: Treatment groupThe intervention was performed by two licensed acupuncturists with at least 10 years of clinical experience who received two weeks of training in standardized intervention methods prior to the trial. Acupoints location refers to the WHO Standard Acupuncture Point Locations in the Western Pacific Region (WHO Standard)〔41〕.The acupuncture group will receive the following acupoints (Figure 3, Table 2): the affected side of Chize(LU5), Quchi (LI11), Dubi (ST35), Fengshi (GB31), and Xiyangguan (GB33).
- Placebo Comparator: Control groupThe device's sham needling operation mimics real needling through appearance and tactile sensation, making it difficult for patients to distinguish, meeting the requirement of blinding and effectively controlling the patients' cognitive bias towards the type of intervention. Patients in the sham acupuncture group received this sham acupuncture intervention, which was designed to ensure that only the actual biological effects of acupuncture differed between the experimental group and the control group, and to exclude the psychological implication effects caused by the patients' expectation effects or the operation itself, so as to enhance the scientific validity and reliability of the research results.
Primary Outcome Measure
Numerical rating scale [ Time Frame: For participants who completed baseline enrollment, efficacy observations were made at treatment enrollment, week 4, week 8, week 16, and week 24. ]
Central Contacts
- Wu zenan13807004791
Find similar trials
Related Studies
- Clinical Orthopaedic Data Bank (Acute and Chronic)Recruiting · University of Florida · Gainesville, Florida
- Safety & Effectiveness of Autologous Regenerative Cell Therapy on Pain & Inflammation of Osteoarthritis of the ShoulderPHASE2 · Recruiting · VivaTech International, Inc. · Grove City, Pennsylvania
- Safety & Effectiveness of Autologous Regenerative Cell Therapy on Pain & Inflammation of Osteoarthritis of the KneePHASE2 · Recruiting · VivaTech International, Inc. · Grove City, Pennsylvania
- Safety & Effectiveness of Autologous Regenerative Cell Therapy on Pain & Inflammation of Osteoarthritis of the HipPHASE2 · Recruiting · VivaTech International, Inc. · Grove City, Pennsylvania