Identifying the Best Follow up Approach for People Who Have Had Treatment to Cure Newly Diagnosed Prostate Cancer

Sponsor
Imperial College London
Study ID
NCT07264088
Status
Not Yet Recruiting

Notify me when recruiting opens

Save your spot on the interest list for this study. We'll keep your details with this study so our team can follow up when recruiting opens.

Not yet recruiting

Add your contact details and location so we can keep your interest tied to this study.

Conditions

Eligibility Criteria

Sex
MALE
Age
18 Years - N/A
Healthy Volunteers
Not accepted

Interventions

  • Hospital based follow up — OTHER
    Exclusively hospital led follow up, face-to-face or remotely by the specialist treating team.
  • Primary care based follow up — OTHER
    After the initial hospital follow up, patients are discharged and exclusively managed by (non-specialist) general practices (GP or nurse led) in face-to-face or remote appointments, with hospital referral as necessary.
  • Planned shared care follow up — OTHER
    An ongoing combination of general practice and hospital management
  • Self-management — OTHER
    After initial hospital follow up, patients are discharged and managed remotely, with no scheduled review. A tracking system monitors prostate-specific antigen (PSA) tests performed in primary care or secondary care. Patients access support workers for remote consultation to discuss symptoms and request further specialist management as required.

Study Details

Over 20,000 patients a year in the UK get surgery or radiotherapy to cure their prostate cancer. These men then undergo regular check-ups to manage potential side effects and see if cancer recurs so it can be treated quickly. The organisation of these check-ups varies across the country as it is not known which approach is best. The four different established approaches are (i) check-ups performed in hospital outpatients by the same team that provided treatment; (ii) patients seen regularly by their GP with hospital referral as necessary; (iii) planned shared care between general practice and hospital follow up; or (iv) patients supported to provide checks on themselves (self-care) and reaching out to a doctor or a nurse when required. This study will compare these options to establish which is best for patients and makes the best use of the NHS resources.

Key Dates

First listed
Dec 4, 2025
Start date
Oct 31, 2026
Status verified
Apr 2026
Primary completion
Jul 31, 2027
Completion
Jul 31, 2027

Study Design

Enrollment
100,000 participants (estimated)

Arms

  • Arm: Hospital based follow up
    Exclusively hospital led follow up, face-to-face or remotely by the specialist treating team.
  • Arm: Primary care based follow up
    After the initial hospital follow up, patients are discharged and exclusively managed by (non-specialist) general practices (GP or nurse led) in face-to-face or remote appointments, with hospital referral as necessary.
  • Arm: Planned shared care follow up
    An ongoing combination of general practice and hospital management
  • Arm: Self-management
    After initial hospital follow up, patients are discharged and managed remotely, with no scheduled review. A tracking system monitors prostate-specific antigen (PSA) tests performed in primary care or secondary care. Patients access support workers for remote consultation to discuss symptoms and request further specialist management as required.

Primary Outcome Measure

Safety and clinical effectiveness defined by treatment for cancer recurrence [ Time Frame: At 3 years following end of initial radical surgery or radiotherapy or focal therapy ]

Central Contacts

Find similar trials

Related Studies