Cognitive Neurocomputational Task Reliability & Clinical Applications Consortium (CNTRACS): Study 1

Part of paid clinical trials in Irvine, California.

Sponsor
Washington University School of Medicine
Study ID
NCT07853807
Status
Recruiting

Conditions

Eligibility Criteria

Sex
ALL
Age
18 Years - 59 Years
Healthy Volunteers
Accepted

Interventions

  • Motion Perception Task — BEHAVIORAL
    Assesses updating of beliefs from new sensory inputs with prior knowledge via perceiving direction changes in random dot motion stimuli
  • Sine Wave Speech Task — BEHAVIORAL
    Measures the degree to which overweighting of prior beliefs impacts processing of sensory inputs (detection of speech).
  • Volatility Task — BEHAVIORAL
    Measures the updating of priors about the location of a bag drop from a helicopter when the location changes (prediction errors).
  • Choice Probabilistic Reversal Task — BEHAVIORAL
    Assesses prior belief updating when feedback about obtaining positive outcomes changes (prediction errors).
  • Kamin Blocking Task — BEHAVIORAL
    Examines the role of mismatches between learned priors and new information (prediction errors) in belief formation about event causes.
  • Minnesota Trust Game — BEHAVIORAL
    Assesses the degree to which people distinguish between their priors about others' motivations, such as selfishness and spite, and impersonal chance in one-shot trust game and dictator games.
  • Dynamic Trust Game — BEHAVIORAL
    Assesses degree to which people learn and update priors about trusting partners from dynamic social feedback (prediction error) in a social exchange game.

Study Details

In Study 1, investigators will test the ability of each of the seven paradigms to differentiate between schizophrenia (SZ)/schizoaffective disorder (SZA) and matched healthy control subjects (HC) and to predict individual differences in clinical measures of hallucinations and delusions (as well as measures of function). Investigators will also directly compare the tasks in terms of predictive ability and psychometric properties and determine whether the tasks share variance or explain unique variance. This will include determining whether hallucinations and delusions are best explained by separate underlying processes or by a single process. Investigators will also test whether the model-based parameters from these studies are more precise and sensitive than standard behavioral methods for assessing deficits across psychotic disorders and for predicting hallucinations and delusions (Aim 1). Investigators will also validate key model-based parameters against well-characterized neurophysiological measures using electroencephalogram (EEG) (Aim 4). The data from Study 1 will also be used to optimize (e.g., length, floor, and ceiling effects) tasks for Study 2. To generate a sample with sufficient variation in hallucinations and delusions, investigators will recruit the following groups that balance feasibility with clinical relevance: A) healthy controls (HC) \[HC, N=125\]; B) schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder \[SZ/SZA, N=200\]). For Study 1, investigators will ensure that 40 patients are unmedicated. Investigators anticipate a \~20% screen fail/drop-out rate based on our prior Cognitive Neuroscience Test Reliability and Clinical Applications for Schizophrenia Consortium (CNTRACS) studies. Thus, investigators will run an additional 40 SZ/SZA and 15 HC. All sites have experience recruiting patients in each of these groups as indicated by our past successful studies, and the fact that investigators have been able to recruit patients with significant hallucinations and delusions in all groups. Investigators will also validate key model-based parameters against well-characterized neurophysiological measures using electroencephalogram (EEG) (Aim 4). The data from Study 1 will also be used to optimize (e.g., length, floor, and ceiling effects) tasks for Study 2. To generate a sample with sufficient variation in hallucinations and delusions, investigators will recruit the following groups that balance feasibility with clinical relevance: A) healthy controls (HC) \[HC, N=125\]; B) schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder \[SZ/SZA, N=200\]). For Study 1, investigators will ensure that 40 patients are unmedicated. Investigators anticipate a \~20% screen fail/drop-out rate based on our prior Cognitive Neuroscience Test Reliability and Clinical Applications for Schizophrenia Consortium (CNTRACS) studies. Thus, investigators will run an additional 40 SZ/SZA and 15 HC. All sites have experience recruiting patients in each of these groups as indicated by our past successful studies, and the fact that investigators have been able to recruit patients with significant hallucinations and delusions in all groups.

Key Dates

First listed
Oct 2, 2026
Start date
Oct 1, 2026
Status verified
Sep 2026
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2031
Completion
Jun 30, 2031

Study Design

Enrollment
325 participants (estimated)
Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE

Primary Outcome Measure

Motion Perception Task Performance [ Time Frame: 1 hour ]

Central Contacts

Locations (5)

FacilityCityStateZIPSite coordinators
University of California, IrvineIrvineCalifornia92868
Cameron Carter, MD
916-734-2972
The University of ChicagoChicagoIllinois60637
Molly Erickson, Ph.D.
(773) 702-5855
Nicole Ogbuagu, B.S.
773-795-2633
University of Maryland, BaltimoreBaltimoreMaryland21201
James Gold, MD
(410) 402-7871
University of MinnesotaMinneapolisMinnesota55455
Angus Macdonald III, Ph.D.
612-624-3813
Alyssa Zimmerman, BA
651-558-1275
Washington UniversitySt LouisMissouri63108
Deanna Barch, Ph.D.
314-935-8729
Lori Ingram
314-747-2160

Find similar trials in Irvine, CA

By condition

Related Studies