Large Language Models Assist in Tumor MDT

Sponsor
Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University
Study ID
NCT07504367
Status
Recruiting
Apply to this trial

Conditions

Eligibility Criteria

Sex
ALL
Age
25 Years - 33 Years
Healthy Volunteers
Accepted

Interventions

  • LLM assists in MDT report writing — OTHER
    This study was a prospective RCT, and the intervention content was an auxiliary tool for writing MDT reports. The intervention group used LLM to assist in the writing of MDT reports. The prescribed MDT medical records (excluding diagnosis and treatment opinions) were input into the LLM, and the output content could be used as a reference for the MDT report. Finally, the MDT diagnosis and treatment opinions were written under the personal judgment of the doctors. The control group used traditional information retrieval methods (such as Google, literature, and textbooks) to write MDT diagnosis and treatment opinions.

Study Details

Multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) represent the gold standard for personalized tumor treatment, but they are limited by medical resources and accessibility Limitation. Although large language models (LLMs) have shown promise in medical reasoning, their multidisciplinary practicality in pan-cancer MDTs has not been fully explored. In the early stage of this project, LLMs with high clinical application efficacy were identified through benchmark tests, and an open-label randomized controlled study (RCT) was conducted based on these LLMs. The research aims to explore whether AI-assisted assistance can enhance the accuracy and writing efficiency of MDT diagnosis and treatment reports. This study intends to prospectively collect the diagnosis and treatment information of 20 patients and MDT diagnosis and treatment information. It is planned to recruit 40 junior doctors. Doctors in the intervention group will use LLM to assist in the writing of MDT reports, while doctors in the control group will use traditional information retrieval methods for the writing of MDT reports. Three clinical experts ultimately used a standardized Likert scale to conduct comprehensive and multidisciplinary scoring of the MDT reports of the intervention group and the control group. This study quantitatively compared the diagnosis and treatment quality and efficiency of the MDT AI-assisted model and the traditional model to verify the application potential of large language models in assisting tumor diagnosis and treatment.

Key Dates

First listed
Mar 31, 2026
Start date
Jan 1, 2026
Status verified
Mar 2026
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2026
Completion
Dec 31, 2026

Study Design

Enrollment
60 participants (estimated)
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT

Arms

  • Experimental: AI-MDT
    This study was a prospective RCT, and the intervention content was an auxiliary tool for writing MDT reports. The intervention group used LLM to assist in the writing of MDT reports. The prescribed MDT medical records (excluding diagnosis and treatment opinions) were input into the LLM, and the output content could be used as a reference for the MDT report. Finally, the MDT diagnosis and treatment opinions were written under the personal judgment of the doctors.
  • No Intervention: Trad-MDT
    The control group used traditional information retrieval methods (such as Google, literature, and textbooks) to write MDT diagnosis and treatment opinions.

Primary Outcome Measure

The overall score of the MDT report [ Time Frame: Up to 4 weeks, complete the writing of medical opinions for all cases (n=20). ]

Central Contacts

Find similar trials

Nationwide
Breast cancer trialsColorectal cancer trialsLiver cancer trialsLung cancer trialsGastric cancer trialsOncology trialsBreast oncology trialsWomen's health trialsGI oncology trialsHepatology trialsLung oncology trialsLung disease trials

Related Studies